Apollo Interactive

Selected engagements

Connor Brooke
Go-to-market, digital asset infrastructure
Glasgow, United Kingdom

I work with companies building the infrastructure underneath stablecoins and tokenization, on the problem of becoming credible to the institutions they need to sell to.

Most of these teams have built something genuinely good and describe it in a language their buyer does not speak. My background is finance rather than crypto marketing, so the work is translating what has been built into terms a bank, an allocator or a risk committee can actually underwrite. Four engagements are set out below.

Exhibit 01 / Tokenized real estate / Current, 5 months

Building investor demand for a regulated property token

A tokenized property offering from one of the UK's largest developers, structured through an established London wealth management firm. The instrument is a regulated security, which means it cannot be promoted, so every piece of the engagement runs inside FCA guardrails.

Read the full noteClose the full note

The approach is education rather than promotion. We build authority around the category, the structure and the reasoning behind it, so that when an allocator looks into the offering they arrive at someone who has already demonstrated they understand it. The founder's profile was dormant when we started and his earlier posts were working against him. He is now approached rather than doing the approaching.

Institutions buying regulated product care a great deal about who is handling their public communications. Operating credibly inside those constraints is most of the job.

Audience added 1,000 approx.
Investor conversations 3
Furthest progressed £m soft commitment
Inbound quality Tier 1 operators

BasisAudience added from LinkedIn profile analytics over the engagement period. Investor conversations, soft commitment stage and inbound quality are client-reported. Attribution qualified at note †.

Exhibit 02 / Layer 1 blockchain / 4 months

Founder presence in a deeply technical category

Chief executive of a Layer 1 blockchain, covering the chain itself, its integrations and its decentralised exchange. The brief was translation rather than invention.

Read the full noteClose the full note

Everything published traced back to something he had already said in a tweet, a podcast or an interview, restructured into a format that worked on the platform. Nothing was editorialised on his behalf, which matters when the audience includes the engineers and partners who would notice immediately.

The presence became load-bearing enough that he launched a podcast off the back of it, which now runs alongside the written work and feeds it.

Audience added 1,000 approx.
Period 4 months
Extended into Podcast hosted

BasisAudience added from LinkedIn profile analytics over the engagement period. Period from Apollo engagement records. The podcast is publicly published and independently verifiable.

Exhibit 03 / UK fintech, tokenization and charitable sector / Retained

From a standing start to inbound partnership meetings

A UK technology firm working across tokenization and the charitable sector. The chief executive had no meaningful presence when we began.

Read the full noteClose the full note

Two months of consistent publishing put him in front of roughly two thousand individual people, most of them in a narrow and hard to reach set of organisations. It produced meetings with charities that wanted to work with the firm, and fed into a piece of work on a platform for buying and selling carbon credits.

Beyond the brief

Walked the client away from a £500,000 contract

The client was close to signing with a counterparty who would be paying them to build software. Nobody runs diligence in that direction, because checking the party handing you money feels rude.

Something about it did not sit right, so I looked into it on my own initiative, well outside what I was engaged to do. The counterparty's commercial position turned out to be materially weaker than it had been presented, alongside undisclosed history.

The client walked away. Five hundred thousand pounds in phase one, with considerably more behind it had the relationship continued.

Impressions 5,209
Unique reached 2,000 approx.
Elapsed 2 months
Contract declined £500k phase one

BasisImpressions and unique reach from LinkedIn post analytics across the two month period. Elapsed period from Apollo engagement records. The declined contract value is client-reported and refers to phase one only.

Exhibit 04 / Apollo Interactive / Ongoing

The same method, run on my own channel

Every long-term client Apollo has ever had arrived through my own LinkedIn. Either I sent them a message, or they read something I wrote and got in touch. There has been no other channel.

Read the full noteClose the full note

Three posts a week for nine months, aimed deliberately at a narrow audience rather than a large one. Roughly a third of the following are founders, co-founders and chief executives, which on a business platform is the only number that matters.

This is the one entry here you can verify yourself in about two clicks.

Figure 4.1 LinkedIn following, opening position to current
LinkedIn following, opening position to current Two observed values. At month zero the following was approximately 300. At month nine the following was 3,311. The line drawn between the two points is indicative of direction only and is not a recorded month by month series. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 0 3 6 9 Months elapsed Followers 300 Month 0 · approx. 300 followers · opening position 3,311 Month 9 · 3,311 followers · current
Following 300 → 3,311
Elapsed 9 months
Decision makers ~1/3 of audience
Cadence 3 per week

BasisLinkedIn analytics on my own profile, which is public. Decision maker share is taken from LinkedIn's follower demographic breakdown. In Figure 4.1 the opening and current values are observed. The path drawn between them is indicative of direction only and is not a recorded month by month series.

Education BSc Finance
MSc Investment Fund Management
Practice Apollo Interactive
Founded 2020
Sector Stablecoin and tokenization infrastructure
Buyers served Banks, asset managers, payment firms, family offices

Attribution stated honestly. The investor conversations in engagement 01 followed a period in which several things changed at once, including a new website and a rebuilt investor onboarding flow. Content and outreach were one input among several rather than the sole cause, and I would rather say so than claim otherwise.